i think they woujld oppose american style government because the american government bleives that church and state should be serperated by law, and that religion hsould have nothing to do with government
I think that they were opposed to american style democracy because It doesn't separate the religious matters from criminal or civil matters. What do you guys think?
I think that they would oppose an American-style democracy because the american democracy separates the peoples religion from other parts of life. In America, the government doesnn't really get involved with peoples religious beliefs, except for that they say we have the freedom to practice whatever religion we choose.
Muslims who believe in Shari'a law would be opposed to an american government because of the freedom that americans have, and americans like to keep their goverment seperate from their church, adn religions.
In my opinion the muslim people were opposed to the american style government because Americans have more control over the laws and rulings we must obey.Whereas, in the muslim government they have already preset laws they must obey.
Modern muslims that believe in Shia's law are opposed to American-style democracy. I think this is beacuse the Shia' represents the right way people should be governed and the way they should behave from god. And that's the way those Muslims live...by following Gods commandments. But in the American-style democrarcy, the people choose what they want the rules to be. They're not listening to God's commandements but making up their own rules!
i think that modren muslims who believe in shari'a law are opposed to american-style democracy because they are always doing whatever there religion is about 24/7 which does not come after our rule church state law in america which says you leave your religion at home then go to work not bring it with you which shari'a people do.
ya about the hwole shari thing... ummmm it is(correct me if i am wrong) but is it the way that they were taught to live and the rules they have to follow in daiyl life???
"i think that modren muslims who believe in shari'a law are opposed to american-style democracy because they are always doing whatever there religion is about 24/7 which does not come after our rule church state law in america which says you leave your religion at home then go to work not bring it with you which shari'a people do."
To summerize Edy believes that shari'a people involved their religion with life
I totally agree
The shari'a people parallel their life with everything they do
ok but a quick qeustion... why would the muslims want to follow the shai(cant spell) and not the american if people are saying that our way is better... like patricia says that we get to make up our own rules??? not that i agree with our way or there way
I think they would appose it because they incorporate religion with their everyday state government, but American government has religion and state seperate.
They would oppose american style government because the american government bleives that church and state should be serperated by law, and that religion shouldn't have an affect on the government.
I think they are opposed to american style government because Muslims don't separate religious matters from criminal and code matters. They believe it should be together however the American government believes they should be separated.
I think that Shari's is a way of life that will control Your day to day life. the whole point of living in a democracy like we do is the right to controll your own life.
They believed that people should have their own say in who is in charge and how they live their life as long as it conforms to the Qu'ran. They do not think that what the majority of peolpe think should dictate your life and how or when you practice your religon.
i think that modern Muslims who believe in Shari'a law are opposed to the American-style democracy because our american style democracy is more free and less controlled than Shari'a law was.
T think modern Muslims who believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American'style democracy because they combine the two concepts of religion and government and most Americans believe that the church and government should be separate.
Modern Muslims are opposed to American-style democracy because how our country's run isn't based on religion; it's based off of common behavior and rules. In Islamic countries however, they believe that religion and what we call the "non-religious" part of life should just be a single group. There shouldn't be any seperation to the two.
American-style government keeps civil and criminal matters seperate from religous matters. The shari'a law says that we have to bring both religon and criminal matters together. Therefore the two ideas contradict each other and so modern Muslims oppose American-style democratic government.
I don't think that religious and personal life is kept seperate. Look at how publicly we celebrate religious holidays and look at the money the we use.
I'm totally in agreement with what david had said.....the whole "In God We Trust" comment. That's right, so i suppose that even if the government says stuff about how we don't base our government off of religion, technically, it's an incoorect statement. This topic could go on forever........
Modern Muslims believe that God makes up the lawsin the world and that they should follow God's laws. They also believe if they neclect their God, they will be punished. In American Democracy, the government creates the laws and the people follow them. Also,Muslims believe that their religious life and their privatew life will be always together..... i think
The sharia preaches that religion should affect all decisions that are made regarding the well-being of the people. The American government has no religion as stated in the First Amendment.
I think that modern Muslims that believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American-style democracy because in our deomcracy it is very accepting and we welcome all religions or beliefs and shari'a law states that all religions or beliefs should re seperated from one another.
they are opposed because modern american style democracy because they think that religion should be tied very closely to the governemnt while in an american style democracy it should be completely seperate. They believe government decisions should be made along with the religion being followed and what is correct within the religion. if there were many different religions in one area like in america then this could not happen.
It seems that most people got the basic point that American-style democracy calls for a separation of church and state which would not fit with Shari'a law which combines civil with religious matters. While most Americans consider the Ten Commandments to be a basic approximation of our moral code, only three of the Ten Commandments are actually laws in America. Under Shari'a all of the Ten Commandments are laws in addition to the rest of the Muslim civil and moral code.
Ok, the winners of the "Best Post of the Day" for this question are:
Patricia Aidah-Mulondo (spelling of Shari'a corrected)
"Modern muslims that believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American-style democracy. I think this is beacuse the Shari'a represents the right way people should be governed and the way they should behave from god. And that's the way those Muslims live...by following Gods commandments. But in the American-style democrarcy, the people choose what they want the rules to be. They're not listening to God's commandements but making up their own rules!"
and
Logan Cerutti (he did the best job of looking at things from the Muslim perspective)
"American style democracies separates America into different groups with opposing thoughts
91 comments:
I think they would oppose american style government because the american government believes that church and state should be seperated
I think modern muslims would be opposed because of the amount of freedom Americans have.
i think they woujld oppose american style government because the american government bleives that church and state should be serperated by law, and that religion hsould have nothing to do with government
They would oppose beacuse its so different from what Shari'a law actually is
tj copied me
i also think modern humans would be opposed because of the amount of freedom americans have
i definartly did not, i looked at you answer and took info from it and put it into my own words, so i did not plagerise it
They would oppose beacuse its so different from what Shari'a law actually is
Also, most of the laws we have to follow in the U.S. have nothing to do with laws of the various religions that are practiced around the country.
They don't think everybody is equal (not that people are actually equal in democracies), but that goes against the "principles" of democracy.
Also, most of the laws we have to follow in the U.S. have nothing to do with laws of the various religions that are practiced around the country.
I think muslims wouyld be composed because americans keep church and government separate but they dont.
also They don't think everybody is equal (not that people are actually equal in democracies), but that goes against the "principles" of democracy.
hey tj nice pic kid hahahah
isn't this law the laws that rule the muslim peoples lives??
Don't copy me
I think that they were opposed to american style democracy because It doesn't separate the religious matters from criminal or civil matters. What do you guys think?
they may believe that there should be one ruler and the people should not decide things hense the word democracy when people decide and vote
I think that they would oppose an American-style democracy because the american democracy separates the peoples religion from other parts of life. In America, the government doesnn't really get involved with peoples religious beliefs, except for that they say we have the freedom to practice whatever religion we choose.
They don't think everybody is equal (not that people are actually equal in democracies), but that goes against the "principles" of democracy.
hahahahah you-yang if that how u spell it hahahaha just playing man
I agree with what you're saying, scott
Muslims who believe in Shari'a law would be opposed to an american government because of the freedom that americans have, and americans like to keep their goverment seperate from their church, adn religions.
thanks jess
In my opinion the muslim people were opposed to the american style government because Americans have more control over the laws and rulings we must obey.Whereas, in the muslim government they have already preset laws they must obey.
Scott got it right on
Look at these wise words
"They don't think everybody is equal (not that people are actually equal in democracies), but that goes against the "principles" of democracy.
hahahahah you-yang if that how u spell it hahahaha just playing man"
Those were my words
Yu yang copied me
Alex could emphasize on that last comment that you made?
Modern muslims that believe in Shia's law are opposed to American-style democracy.
I think this is beacuse the Shia' represents the right way people should be governed and the way they should behave from god. And that's the way those Muslims live...by following Gods commandments.
But in the American-style democrarcy, the people choose what they want the rules to be. They're not listening to God's commandements but making up their own rules!
what is the Shari'a law??
A Shari's is a way of life that will control your daily actions. the whole point of a democracy is to be free in your decisions is it not?
i forget what Shari'a is, what is it?
Patricia, i completly agree with you! you make a great point :)
patricia is right everyone read her comment!!!!!!!
i think that modren muslims who believe in shari'a law are opposed to american-style democracy because they are always doing whatever there religion is about 24/7 which does not come after our rule church state law in america which says you leave your religion at home then go to work not bring it with you which shari'a people do.
i have no input for this one
if u dont know waht the shria'a law is Patricia's comment totally explains it.
ya about the hwole shari thing... ummmm it is(correct me if i am wrong) but is it the way that they were taught to live and the rules they have to follow in daiyl life???
i DISAGREE with Eddy. That is not really correct
sorry edy, i agree with Patrica, but nice try. maybe some other time!
what dou mean eddy?????
we have seperation of church and state and the Shari'a law doesnt have that.
Haha, yeah, Patricia basically covers it.
And also a little bit of Katy's comment - Americans have the freedom to do whatever they want; they are not exactly controlled by the government.
mr. paulson agree's with me so people sttp disagrying(idk how to spell that)
so no one agrees with any of my coments on any of the things?? eddy ur are excused from answering this question
no no one agrees with you mitchelle
This is a good comment
"i think that modren muslims who believe in shari'a law are opposed to american-style democracy because they are always doing whatever there religion is about 24/7 which does not come after our rule church state law in america which says you leave your religion at home then go to work not bring it with you which shari'a people do."
To summerize
Edy believes that shari'a people involved their religion with life
I totally agree
The shari'a people parallel their life with everything they do
They follow their religions at all times
ok but a quick qeustion... why would the muslims want to follow the shai(cant spell) and not the american if people are saying that our way is better... like patricia says that we get to make up our own rules??? not that i agree with our way or there way
comment
I think they would appose it because they incorporate religion with their everyday state government, but American government has religion and state seperate.
American style democracies separates America into different groups with opposing thoughts
Shari'a brings people together and unifies them
They would oppose american style government because the american government bleives that church and state should be serperated by law, and that religion shouldn't have an affect on the government.
I think they are opposed to american style government because Muslims don't separate religious matters from criminal and code matters. They believe it should be together however the American government believes they should be separated.
I think that Shari's is a way of life that will control Your day to day life. the whole point of living in a democracy like we do is the right to controll your own life.
i totally agree what a interesting comment greg your so smart
They believed that people should have their own say in who is in charge and how they live their life as long as it conforms to the Qu'ran. They do not think that what the majority of peolpe think should dictate your life and how or when you practice your religon.
i think that modern Muslims who believe in Shari'a law are opposed to the American-style democracy because our american style democracy is more free and less controlled than Shari'a law was.
T think modern Muslims who believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American'style democracy because they combine the two concepts of religion and government and most Americans believe that the church and government should be separate.
Modern Muslims are opposed to American-style democracy because how our country's run isn't based on religion; it's based off of common behavior and rules. In Islamic countries however, they believe that religion and what we call the "non-religious" part of life should just be a single group. There shouldn't be any seperation to the two.
because the Shari'a law is not democracy; the people that believe in the law wouldnt believe in democracy. probably
American-style government keeps civil and criminal matters seperate from religous matters. The shari'a law says that we have to bring both religon and criminal matters together. Therefore the two ideas contradict each other and so modern Muslims oppose American-style democratic government.
I don't think that religious and personal life is kept seperate. Look at how publicly we celebrate religious holidays and look at the money the we use.
I'm totally in agreement with what david had said.....the whole "In God We Trust" comment. That's right, so i suppose that even if the government says stuff about how we don't base our government off of religion, technically, it's an incoorect statement. This topic could go on forever........
HOw do we bring religious and criminal matters together Symone?
Modern Muslims believe that God makes up the lawsin the world and that they should follow God's laws. They also believe if they neclect their God, they will be punished. In American Democracy, the government creates the laws and the people follow them. Also,Muslims believe that their religious life and their privatew life will be always together..... i think
Modern Muslims are opposed to American-style democracy because the American Government believes that church and state should be seperated.
The sharia preaches that religion should affect all decisions that are made regarding the well-being of the people. The American government has no religion as stated in the First Amendment.
I think that modern Muslims that believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American-style democracy because in our deomcracy it is very accepting and we welcome all religions or beliefs and shari'a law states that all religions or beliefs should re seperated from one another.
American style is that religion and state (church and state) should be separate and sharia law does not agree with this
jen i disagree
Because they don't separate religion and government, but we do
i would have to agree with everyone except for malloy jen and kelsey
Because shari'a law is almost the opposite of church and state beingseparated, they want the church to govern.
they are opposed because modern american style democracy because they think that religion should be tied very closely to the governemnt while in an american style democracy it should be completely seperate. They believe government decisions should be made along with the religion being followed and what is correct within the religion. if there were many different religions in one area like in america then this could not happen.
I agree with dillon o'g
well said newton
i agree with kelsey c's statement which is supported by my previous comment regarding the separation of church and government.
It seems that most people got the basic point that American-style democracy calls for a separation of church and state which would not fit with Shari'a law which combines civil with religious matters. While most Americans consider the Ten Commandments to be a basic approximation of our moral code, only three of the Ten Commandments are actually laws in America. Under Shari'a all of the Ten Commandments are laws in addition to the rest of the Muslim civil and moral code.
Ok, the winners of the "Best Post of the Day" for this question are:
Patricia Aidah-Mulondo (spelling of Shari'a corrected)
"Modern muslims that believe in Shari'a law are opposed to American-style democracy.
I think this is beacuse the Shari'a represents the right way people should be governed and the way they should behave from god. And that's the way those Muslims live...by following Gods commandments.
But in the American-style democrarcy, the people choose what they want the rules to be. They're not listening to God's commandements but making up their own rules!"
and
Logan Cerutti (he did the best job of looking at things from the Muslim perspective)
"American style democracies separates America into different groups with opposing thoughts
Shari'a brings people together and unifies them"
Post a Comment